NCGA - North Carolina General Assembly
Full Site Search:
Search Bill Text:
Find a Bill:
View Member Info:
Senate Member Vote Statistics
2017-2018 Session

District Name Total Votes Eligible Votes Actual Votes Vote % With Majority With Majority % Against Majority Against Majority %
15 Alexander (R) 239 213 213 100.0% 208 97.7% 5 2.3%
45 Ballard (R) 239 222 219 98.6% 218 99.5% 1 0.5%
18 Barefoot (R) 239 233 233 100.0% 232 99.6% 1 0.4%
17 Barringer (R) 239 211 209 99.1% 199 95.2% 10 4.8%
26 Berger (R) 239 203 203 100.0% 203 100.0% 0 0.0%
39 Bishop (R) 239 213 211 99.1% 208 98.6% 3 1.4%
14 Blue (D) 239 212 208 98.1% 158 76.0% 50 24.0%
13 Britt (R) 239 236 236 100.0% 234 99.2% 2 0.8%
34 Brock (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 235 98.3% 4 1.7%
6 Brown (R) 239 233 233 100.0% 230 98.7% 3 1.3%
4 Bryant (D) 239 235 234 99.6% 184 78.6% 50 21.4%
16 Chaudhuri (D) 239 238 238 100.0% 188 79.0% 50 21.0%
21 Clark (D) 239 239 239 100.0% 203 84.9% 36 15.1%
1 Cook (R) 239 215 215 100.0% 214 99.5% 1 0.5%
44 Curtis (R) 239 234 234 100.0% 234 100.0% 0 0.0%
46 Daniel (R) 239 239 238 99.6% 233 97.9% 5 2.1%
5 D. Davis (D) 239 237 237 100.0% 194 81.9% 43 18.1%
50 J. Davis (R) 239 167 167 100.0% 167 100.0% 0 0.0%
33 Dunn (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 235 98.3% 4 1.7%
48 Edwards (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 236 98.7% 3 1.3%
38 Ford (D) 239 184 183 99.5% 145 79.2% 38 20.8%
23 Foushee (D) 239 232 231 99.6% 178 77.1% 53 22.9%
24 Gunn (R) 239 234 234 100.0% 233 99.6% 1 0.4%
43 Harrington (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 235 98.3% 4 1.7%
47 Hise (R) 239 234 234 100.0% 230 98.3% 4 1.7%
11 Horner (R) 239 233 233 100.0% 227 97.4% 6 2.6%
10 B. Jackson (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 237 99.2% 2 0.8%
37 J. Jackson (D) 239 231 231 100.0% 190 82.3% 41 17.7%
31 Krawiec (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 238 99.6% 1 0.4%
9 Lee (R) 239 222 222 100.0% 221 99.5% 1 0.5%
32 Lowe (D) 239 239 238 99.6% 185 77.7% 53 22.3%
25 McInnis (R) 239 237 237 100.0% 236 99.6% 1 0.4%
20 McKissick (D) 239 212 210 99.1% 169 80.5% 41 19.5%
19 Meredith (R) 239 212 212 100.0% 205 96.7% 7 3.3%
36 Newton (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 237 99.2% 2 0.8%
7 Pate (R) 239 237 237 100.0% 236 99.6% 1 0.4%
12 Rabin (R) 239 234 234 100.0% 231 98.7% 3 1.3%
8 Rabon (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 238 99.6% 1 0.4%
30 Randleman (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 235 98.3% 4 1.7%
28 Robinson (D) 239 208 208 100.0% 157 75.5% 51 24.5%
2 Sanderson (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 235 98.3% 4 1.7%
3 Smith-Ingram (D) 239 234 231 98.7% 183 79.2% 48 20.8%
41 Tarte (R) 239 200 200 100.0% 197 98.5% 3 1.5%
29 Tillman (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 237 99.2% 2 0.8%
35 Tucker (R) 239 223 220 98.7% 217 98.6% 3 1.4%
49 Van Duyn (D) 239 239 239 100.0% 187 78.2% 52 21.8%
40 Waddell (D) 239 239 239 100.0% 189 79.1% 50 20.9%
27 Wade (R) 239 205 205 100.0% 205 100.0% 0 0.0%
42 Wells (R) 239 239 239 100.0% 237 99.2% 2 0.8%
22 Woodard (D) 239 220 219 99.5% 171 78.1% 48 21.9%

Data Last Updated: May 27 2017 11:35PM

Total Votes - The total number of roll call votes taken this session on the chamber floor.
Eligible Votes - The number of votes the member was eligible to vote on this session. This number does not include votes taken when the member had an excused absence or an excused vote.
Paired Votes - The number of times an absent member paired with a member present in the chamber to cast offsetting votes.
Actual Votes - The number of actual votes the member cast on the chamber floor this session.
Vote % - The percentage of eligible votes this session on which the member voted.
With Majority - The number of times this session the member voted the same way as the outcome of the vote. If a specific vote passed and the member voted AYE, then that vote counted as WITH THE MAJORITY.
With Majority % - The With Majority votes divided by the Actual Votes.
Against Majority - The number of time this session the member voted opposite way as the outcome of the vote. If a specific vote failed and the member voted AYE, then that vote counted as AGAINST THE MAJORITY.
Against Majority % - The Against Majority votes divided by the Actual Votes.

* Presiding Officer

Speaker and Speaker Pro Tem often do not vote while presiding; therefore their voting % may be low.